BranditScan
Best for: Publishes a Fansly-specific route, three stagenames at $69. BranditScan publishes a dedicated Fansly page alongside OnlyFans, ManyVids, Chaturbate and JustForFans, and covers three stagenames on the entry plan — which is the shape a cross-posting creator actually has.
Pricing reality: Premium: $69/mo for 3 stagenames. Premium (annual): $690/yr for 3 stagenames. White Glove: $149/mo for Unlimited stagenames. White Glove (annual): $1490/yr for Unlimited stagenames.
What it does better: Three stage names are included in the $69/mo entry plan, where a per-username competitor would charge for each.
What makes people leave: For a cross-posting creator specifically: no platform-specific route is published, so coverage of Fansly is an inference from a general claim rather than something stated. branditscan.com on BranditScan
Verdict: Premium covers three stagenames; more than three requires White Glove at $149/mo. Both tiers advertise the same core feature set — White Glove buys stagenames, a concierge and more aggressive scanning rather than new capability. Telegram is not named anywhere on BranditScan's pricing page or its benefits page; the published social surfaces are Instagram, X and Reddit.
Rulta
Best for: Publishes a Fansly route, priced per username. Rulta names Fansly DMCA as a service alongside OnlyFans. The catch is the model: two names is $184 and three is $324, and cross-posters usually have more than one.
Pricing reality: Pro: $139/mo for 1 username. Premier: $184/mo for 2 usernames. Legend: $324/mo for 4 usernames.
What it does better: Rulta states it is "Google's Trusted Copyright Partner" and cites Google's public Transparency Report for a claimed 200,000,000+ links reported.
What makes people leave: For a cross-posting creator specifically: the per-username model charges for the second handle, so a Fansly plus OnlyFans creator starts at $184 rather than $139. rulta.com on Rulta
Verdict: Plans stop at four usernames. Telegram takedown, copyright registration and reverse image search appear only on Legend, the $324/mo tier. Submission volume is capped below Legend.
Bruqi
Best for: All usernames at $29, no platform-specific pages. Bruqi names no platform routes at all and covers every username on one price, which is structurally the right shape for cross-posting even without a Fansly page to point at.
Pricing reality: DIY: $0/mo for Manual removals only. Side Hustle: $29/mo for All usernames. Creator Pro: $99/mo for All usernames. Top 1%: $249/mo for All usernames.
What it does better: Every paid tier covers all usernames at one price, starting at $29/mo — the flattest pricing model of the five competitors compared here.
What makes people leave: For a cross-posting creator specifically: no platform-specific route is published, so coverage of Fansly is an inference from a general claim rather than something stated. bruqi.com on Bruqi
Verdict: Automatic removal is not part of the free tier. Scan frequency, not username count, is what separates the paid tiers: weekly on Side Hustle, daily on Creator Pro, hourly on Top 1%.
Privly
Best for: One flat price, all platforms, nothing platform-specific. $49 a month for all platforms and all content. No Fansly page, and no per-username surcharge to worry about when you add one.
Pricing reality: Free Trial: $0/mo for 7 days, 1 scan, up to 3 uploads. Creator Protection: $49/mo for All platforms, all content. Platform Offboarding: $499 one-time for Concierge, 12 months of cover. Copyright Registration: $299 one-time for Optional add-on.
What it does better: The flattest published price in this comparison for a full-service plan: $49/mo, in Privly's words "Same plan, every feature, no per-username surcharge, no hidden tiers".
What makes people leave: For a cross-posting creator specifically: no platform-specific route is published, so coverage of Fansly is an inference from a general claim rather than something stated. useprivly.com on Privly
Verdict: The trial caps at one scan and three uploads. The paid plan publishes no username, platform or volume cap at all — Privly's own line is "All platforms · All content · One flat fee".
Ceartas
Best for: Per creator, with no platform detail published. The pricing page names no platforms and prices per creator. For a creator posting under several names across two platforms, ask how names are counted before buying.
Pricing reality: Star: $69/mo for 1 creator. Elite: $169/mo for 1 creator. VIP: $349/mo for 1 creator. Platinum: $1200/mo for 1 creator.
What it does better: A published price ladder that reaches genuinely high-touch service, which most of the category does not publish at all.
What makes people leave: For a cross-posting creator specifically: per-creator pricing with no published rule for how stage names are counted inside one subscription, which is the exact question a cross-poster needs answered. ceartas.io on Ceartas
Verdict: Pricing is per creator per month on every tier, so a roster multiplies the bill linearly. The $69 Star tier caps manual takedown requests at 300; unlimited manual requests start at $169/mo.
The objections worth taking seriously
- Is this a scam, like half the category?
- Fair question, and the honest answer is that openDMCA cannot prove it with a testimonial. What it can do is publish the instrument: a notice under 17 U.S.C. §512 is the same one studios file, openDMCA acts as your authorised agent, and the policy that binds openDMCA to that role is public. Read the openDMCA DMCA policy, including the counter-notice route
- It says de-listed, but the file is still sitting there.
- De-listing and removal are two outcomes and openDMCA reports them separately rather than as one number. A de-listing is re-checked against the live index, and a removed URL is re-checked daily in case it came back, which is a different claim from either being finished. What a Google de-listing does and does not do
- Will it file notices against my own pages or my collab partners?
- Your own domains are excluded in openDMCA before a notice is generated, not apologised for afterwards. Whitelisting runs at scan time, so an authorised URL never reaches the takedown queue at all — which is the difference between a filter and a support ticket. How openDMCA separates your official pages from the leaks
Count your handles before you compare any prices
Choosing a Fansly DMCA service comes down to one count, and it takes two minutes. Write down every handle you post under, across every platform, including the one you stopped using.
Why the abandoned handle still counts. Content posted under a name you retired is still circulating under that name, and aggregators index the handle that was attached at the time. A scan pointed only at your current Fansly handle will not find it. Whichever service you pick, add every name you have ever released paid content under, not just the live ones.
Then price the same list at each vendor. At two handles: Bruqi $29, Privly $49, BranditScan $69, openDMCA Starter plus one extra creator at $44, Rulta $184. At three handles: Bruqi $29, Privly $49, BranditScan $69, openDMCA Pro at $89, Rulta $324. The ordering barely changes and the spread is large — this single count decides more than any feature comparison will.
What is genuinely the same as OnlyFans, and worth not re-reading. The hosts, the aggregators, the file hosts, the forum threads, the mirrors and the search results all behave identically regardless of which platform the set was bought on. The removal mechanics, the escalation ladder and the reupload problem are the same job. If you have already read the leak-removal comparison, the mechanics section there covers this and there is no reason to read it twice.
One thing to whitelist that OnlyFans-only creators forget. If you cross-promote between your platforms — a Fansly link in an OnlyFans bio, a linktree, a promo account — those domains are yours and belong in the whitelist before the first scan. Cross-posting creates more of these than a single-platform creator has.
Why one leaked set under two handles is not two problems
A creator who cross-posts the same set to Fansly and elsewhere gets leaked under both names, and the leaked copies land on the same hosts. That is the fact per-username pricing charges twice for and flat pricing does not, and it is worth understanding why the underlying cost does not double.
openDMCA routes every infringing URL through the Removal Graph — a live map of which hosts actually remove content, how fast, and through which channel — so each takedown takes the shortest path that has historically worked for that host. Scanning a second handle costs a second scan. Routing the results costs nothing extra, because the host was already resolved: the abuse-contact cache is shared across every customer, and the outcome corpus that decides whether to send a second notice or fast-path to search de-listing is the same corpus. A host below a 25% removal rate over ninety days, on at least five resolved samples, gets the same treatment whichever handle surfaced it.
Perceptual hashing makes the point sharper. The same set leaked under two names is often the same files, so a reference image that matches one copy matches the other. Two handles, one detection job.
Where openDMCA loses on this page. Price, at the exact shape this page is about. Bruqi covers every handle at $29 and Privly at $49; openDMCA charges $29 for one creator and $15 a month for each additional one. A cross-posting Fansly creator with three handles pays $89 at openDMCA and $29 at Bruqi. That is the honest headline and the routing argument does not erase it.
The estimate below assumes 165 live copies across two handles, which is a typical count once a cross-posted set has been mirrored for a couple of months.