openDMCA

    Free removal tools

    Getting leaked content down is four separate jobs: find who to notify, write a valid notice, get the page out of search results, and check whether any of it worked. openDMCA publishes a free tool for each job, with no account and no held-back result, plus the manual method in full on every page.

    Two things that keep running after you close the tab

    The tools above answer a question once. These two carry on, and both state their cap before you start rather than at the moment it bites.

    What openDMCA gives away for free, and what it charges for

    Every tool above returns its whole answer to an anonymous visitor. The abuse contact lookup shows the real email address. The notice generator returns the full, signable notice. The delisting builders return submission blocks that can be pasted into Google and Bing without editing. Nothing is blurred, truncated, or held back pending an email address.

    What is capped is scale. Each tool allows a stated number of runs an hour, and the batch builders render ten URLs per block. Those caps are printed above each tool, before you invest any effort, because a cap discovered at the moment of payoff is a trick and a cap stated up front is a fair trade.

    openDMCA charges for the part these tools cannot do: running the same work across a whole list on a schedule, escalating hosts that ignore the first notice, and re-checking whether a removed URL came back. Plans and pricing covers what that costs.

    The one thing openDMCA deliberately does not show you

    The free username scan at openDMCA returns per-source counts and never the leaked URLs themselves. That is the single exception to giving back the whole result, and it is a deliberate one: publishing the locations of leaked material to an anonymous visitor would help people find it, which is indefensible for intimate imagery shared without consent.

    Any tool here that touches leak locations follows the same rule. You get the routing, the notice and the submission text for a URL you already have; openDMCA will not hand anyone a list of where somebody else's content is.

    The scan is deliberately kept out of search results, which is why it is linked above rather than indexed: a scan page that ranked would mostly be used to look up other people's handles.

    Frequently asked questions

    Do these tools need an account?

    No. Every tool on this page runs for anonymous visitors and returns its complete result — the real abuse address, the whole notice, the full submission block. What is capped is how many times an hour you can run one, and each page states its cap before you start.

    Is anything I paste into these tools stored?

    No URL, name or email is kept. Each tool page carries a line saying exactly what happens to what you submit. The only thing recorded is a salted hash used for rate limiting, which carries nothing that identifies you.

    Why does openDMCA publish the manual method?

    Because for ten URLs the manual method genuinely works, and pretending otherwise would be dishonest in a market that is already sceptical. What openDMCA sells is doing it for four hundred URLs across thirty hosts, on a schedule, and checking whether it stuck.

    Which tool should I start with?

    If you have a URL and want it gone, start with the abuse contact lookup, then the notice generator. If you are not sure whether copyright is even the right route, start with the route picker at DMCA or NCII.