All posts
    Guide7 minJune 9, 2026

    What Are Coomer and Kemono, and How Do You Get Your Content Removed?

    Coomer and Kemono are aggregators that bulk-scrape paid OnlyFans, Fansly and Patreon posts. Here is how they work and how to file for removal.

    What Are Coomer and Kemono, and How Do You Get Your Content Removed? — visual guide from openDMCA

    Coomer and Kemono are aggregator sites that bulk-scrape posts from paid creator platforms (OnlyFans and Fansly in Coomer's case; Patreon, Fanbox, SubscribeStar and similar in Kemono's case) and republish them for free. To get your content removed, send a DMCA takedown notice to the site's listed abuse or DMCA contact identifying the infringing URLs, and be prepared to re-file: because these sites re-scrape on a schedule, your posts can reappear, so removal usually requires ongoing monitoring rather than a single notice.

    What is Coomer?

    Coomer (which has operated under several domains over the years) is a content aggregator focused on paid adult platforms, primarily OnlyFans and Fansly. It works by collecting media and post text tied to a creator's username and presenting it as a free, browsable archive. The site organizes everything by stage name, so once a profile exists, anyone can scroll an entire back catalog without ever subscribing. For creators, that means content you put behind a paywall, and that paying fans agreed to keep private, ends up indexed and searchable for free.

    What is Kemono?

    Kemono is a sister-style aggregator aimed at subscription platforms like Patreon, Fanbox, SubscribeStar and Gumroad, with some overlap into other paid-content services. Like Coomer, it mirrors posts by creator and keeps them in a free archive. The two sites are commonly grouped together because they share the same basic model: scrape paid posts, strip the paywall, and host the result. If you sell anything behind a Patreon or similar tier, Kemono is the aggregator most likely to surface it; if your work lives on OnlyFans or Fansly, Coomer is the more common culprit. Many creators end up dealing with both.

    Why they re-scrape (the honest part)

    Here is the uncomfortable truth that no removal service should hide from you: aggregators like these are built to re-scrape. They periodically re-check known creator profiles and pull down anything new, and in some cases they re-import content that was previously taken down. So even a successful removal is not always permanent. A leaked post you got pulled in March can quietly reappear in May after the next scraping pass, especially if you are still actively posting on the source platform.

    This is not a reason to give up; it is a reason to treat removal as maintenance, not a one-time fix. The goal is to keep the live, public, easily-found copies down consistently so they generate fewer downstream reuploads on file hosts, forums and search engines. For the bigger picture of how leaks spread across the ecosystem, see our guide to removing leaked OnlyFans content.

    How to get your content removed from Coomer or Kemono

    Both sites publish a DMCA or abuse contact (typically an email address or a removal form linked in the site footer or a dedicated DMCA page). A valid DMCA takedown notice generally needs to include the following:

    • Identification of the copyrighted work being infringed (your original posts/media).
    • The specific infringing URLs on the aggregator, listed individually so there is no ambiguity about what to remove.
    • Your contact information (note the privacy concern below).
    • A good-faith statement that the use is not authorized by you, the copyright owner, or the law.
    • A statement, under penalty of perjury, that the information is accurate and that you are the owner or authorized to act on the owner's behalf.
    • Your physical or electronic signature.

    Two practical cautions. First, a DMCA notice usually requires real contact and identity details, which means filing yourself can expose your legal name and address to the very site hosting your leaks. Filing through an authorized agent lets the notice go out under the agent's details instead of yours. Second, listing exact URLs matters: vague notices ("remove everything about me") are easier for a host to ignore or mishandle than a clean list of specific links.

    Also de-index it from search

    Getting a page removed from the aggregator is only half the job. If the page was already indexed, it can still show up in Google or Bing results, and screenshots or cached copies can linger. Submitting search de-indexing requests removes those entries from results so people searching your name do not land on the leak. Our overview of Google de-indexing for creators walks through what search engines will and will not remove.

    Doing it yourself vs. using a service

    You can absolutely file these notices yourself, and for a single profile it is worth knowing how. The reality, though, is that Coomer and Kemono are two of dozens of places your content can land, and the re-scraping cycle means you are signing up for repeat filings indefinitely. That is the gap automated services fill: continuous scanning, repeat filing as copies reappear, and one less thing to manage emotionally.

    File it yourselfopenDMCA
    CostNo filing fee; your timeCheck current live plan
    Covers Coomer + Kemono
    Re-files when content reappearsManual, ongoingAutomated monitoring
    Search de-indexing requestsYou submit each one
    Keeps your legal name privateOften exposed in noticeFiles via agent details
    Scans other leak sites tooForums, file hosts, Telegram, Reddit

    openDMCA scans public creator-leak surfaces alongside forums, file hosts, messaging channels, and search results, files through agent details, and keeps monitoring for reuploads. Check the current pricing page for plan scope rather than relying on an article snapshot. No service can guarantee that every copy stays gone forever on a site designed to re-scrape; consistent monitoring and evidence-backed notices aim to reduce availability and discoverability over time.

    If most of your reuploads come through OnlyFans or Fansly profiles specifically, our OnlyFans leak removal and Fansly leak removal pages cover the platform-specific workflow.

    Do not estimate impact from an unattributed industry percentage. Measure the creator's own exposed URLs, search impressions, reappearance interval, operator hours, and observed business data. Aggregators can be persistent, so preserve the evidence for each cycle and review the affected profiles on a schedule.

    Run a free username scan to see where your content has leaked, no signup and no uploads required.

    Frequently asked questions

    Can a DMCA notice remove every Coomer or Kemono copy permanently?

    No. A compliant notice can support action against identified material, but mirrors, provider changes, and later reuploads can remain. Preserve evidence, verify each result, and repeat searches rather than treating one response as permanent eradication.

    Why must I list exact infringing URLs?

    Section 512 notices must identify material sufficiently for the service provider to locate it. A domain or profile name alone may be too vague. Keep the page URL, direct media URL when available, and the matching authorized source.

    How do I find the provider or designated DMCA agent?

    Check the site's legal and abuse pages, the U.S. Copyright Office designated-agent directory, and infrastructure records such as ICANN Lookup. Send the notice to the party able to disable the identified material and keep delivery records.

    Will a Google removal request delete the aggregator page?

    No. Google states that Search removal affects results, not the third-party source page. Pair the applicable Search request with provider action if you want both reduced discoverability and source removal.

    Should I send a live login or private library as ownership proof?

    Avoid unnecessary credentials or private archives. Provide enough information to identify the original work and your authority, using controlled source links or a concise evidence schedule. Ask how any sensitive reference material will be handled.

    Sources and methodology

    Product claims were checked against these primary sources on July 18, 2026. Features and policies can change; verify the current terms before buying or filing.