bing.com has no abuse mailbox to write to; it takes removal requests through published request forms, and there are separate ones for copyright and for personal imagery. Filing there also covers the engines that draw on the same index, which is why it is worth doing separately from Google.
Left up, 90 exposed copies work out to an estimated $526 a month in diverted subscriptions. Estimate, not a measurement: it assumes 0.45 diverted subscribers per exposed post at an average subscription price of $12.99. Your number depends on your pricing and audience.
Removal route for bing.com
Resolved live · no account · nothing uploaded
bing.com is an index, not a host. Delisting is the whole route.
1 · Curated host route— silent.No host_handlers row for bing.com.
2 · RDAP abuse contact— resolves.abusecomplaints@markmonitor.com — the registrar's abuse desk, not bing.com itself. Probed 2026-09-04.
3 · Fallback address— not needed.Not needed — an earlier rung resolved.
4 · Network and search— resolves.Delisting is the route here — the index holds the result, not the file.
What happens to what you type: nothing. The domain is matched against openDMCA's routing table in your browser. No request is made to bing.com, no page is fetched, and the text is not stored or sent anywhere.
Choose the request type before drafting anything. bing.com separates copyright removal from personal-imagery removal. The second does not require owning the material, and picking the wrong one is a common reason a request returns nothing.
Collect the exact URLs that return. Search your stage name on bing.com and record what appears. Its results frequently differ from another engine's, so a URL list built elsewhere is usually incomplete here.
Pair copyright requests with the original. A copyright removal request needs the location of your original alongside each infringing URL. Requests missing that field are the ones refused without an explanation.
Submit in bulk rather than one at a time. A single request accepts several URLs and each is assessed separately. Filing them individually multiplies the work without improving any of the outcomes.
Re-search to verify rather than reading a receipt. Search the URLs on bing.com again days later. An accepted request and a removed result are different states, and only the second changes what a visitor sees.
Why bing.com is worth a separate filing
Search engines run separate indexes with separate removal queues. A removal granted by one has no effect on another, so a creator who files with a single engine remains findable through every engine drawing on the other index.
openDMCA builds the bing.com removal payload from the same resolved leak list used for the other engine, so filing the second one costs a rebuild of the export rather than a second round of research.
openDMCA gives the first two hops away: you can open the contact resolver openDMCA uses and run it on a URL of your own, with no account and nothing uploaded.
One thing that catches people out on bing.com
The bing.com index supplies results to other search products as well as its own, so a removal granted there propagates further than a removal granted by a single engine acting alone. That makes the second filing disproportionately valuable relative to its cost — and it is the filing most creators skip, because the first one felt like finishing.
Frequently asked questions
Is there an email address for bing.com removals?
No. Removal requests go through published request forms rather than an abuse mailbox, and the forms ask for the fields the assessment needs.
Does a Google removal cover bing.com?
No. They are separate indexes with separate queues, and a grant by one has no effect on the other. That is why the second filing is worth making.
Which request do I use if I did not take the photos?
The personal-imagery route, which does not depend on owning the material. The copyright route would fail on ownership even though the harm is identical.
Resolve the contact for a host you are dealing with — free, no account.