A simpcity.su thread refills rather than reopening: the URL stays the same and new links are posted underneath. Monitoring the thread URL for changes, rather than checking whether it still exists, is what catches the refill — and each new link is a separate host with its own route.
Left up, 60 exposed copies work out to an estimated $351 a month in diverted subscriptions. Estimate, not a measurement: it assumes 0.45 diverted subscribers per exposed post at an average subscription price of $12.99. Your number depends on your pricing and audience.
Removal route for simpcity.su
Resolved live · no account · nothing uploaded
Nothing publishes a contact for simpcity.su. The notice goes to the fallback address, and the network and search routes carry the weight.
1 · Curated host route— silent.No host_handlers row for simpcity.su.
2 · RDAP abuse contact— silent.rdap.org returns no RDAP service for the .su registry. Probed 2026-09-04.
3 · Fallback address— resolves.abuse@simpcity.su — the address the resolver falls back to. It may not be monitored.
4 · Network and search— runs next.Cloudflare detection over DNS-over-HTTPS, then Google and Bing delisting of every indexed simpcity.su URL.
What happens to what you type: nothing. The domain is matched against openDMCA's routing table in your browser. No request is made to simpcity.su, no page is fetched, and the text is not stored or sent anywhere.
Removal route demo for simpcity.su, reuploads job.
Step by step
Monitor the thread for changes, not for existence. A simpcity.su thread that has been cleared still returns a page. Watching whether it loads tells you nothing; watching whether new links have appeared under it is the check that matters.
Route each new link to its own host. Every link posted into the thread points somewhere with its own abuse route. Treating the refill as one problem and filing one notice about the thread leaves each new file live.
Keep the running record per thread. Log the simpcity.su thread URL once and append each round of links beneath it. That record is what turns a series of individual complaints into an evidenced pattern.
Re-file on the thread with the pattern attached. When a thread refills repeatedly, the notice to the network is about a pattern rather than a page. Attaching the dates and rounds is what distinguishes it from a first complaint.
Keep the thread URL in the delisting list. The thread URL does not change when it refills, so the delisting request stays valid — but new paginated pages appear as the thread grows, and each of those is a new result.
What monitoring on simpcity.su can honestly promise
openDMCA re-checks known URLs on a daily schedule and reopens anything that came back. On a forum that means the thread is re-examined rather than assumed closed, and the new links inside it enter the queue as their own leaks with their own routes.
The honest limit: nothing stops someone posting a new link into a simpcity.su thread. What changes is how quickly the new link is found and routed, and whether that work lands on the creator's Sunday evening or on a queue that runs every thirty minutes.
openDMCA gives the first two hops away: you can open test one URL for a reupload and run it on a URL of your own, with no account and nothing uploaded.
One thing that catches people out on simpcity.su
openDMCA's takedown queue runs every thirty minutes, which matters far more on a refilling forum thread than on a static gallery: a link posted into a simpcity.su thread enters the routing queue in the same hour rather than at the next manual sweep. The thread URL itself never changes, so the trigger has to be the contents rather than the page.
Frequently asked questions
Why does the same simpcity.su thread keep filling up?
The thread is a container organised around a creator, not a single upload. Removing the files it points at empties it; it does not close it, and nothing prevents new links being posted underneath.
Should I file on the thread again each time?
File on the new links each time, and on the thread when the pattern is worth evidencing. A repeat report about a persistent thread is stronger at the network rung than another single-page complaint.
Does anything close a thread permanently?
No route promises that, and openDMCA does not claim one. What is achievable is keeping the thread empty of working links and keeping it out of search results for your name.
Check whether a URL you already reported has come back — free, no account.